On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 04:19:00 +0200 Denis wrote: > If we just want a decision on the games, and not to add them to the > list of software that doesn't respect the FSDG we can have each distro > either:
i think we wat to add them - that list should be resource for any software which has been audited by the work-group and found to be flawed - we should really consider integrating the FSD audits as well the rationale is not merely to be pedantic - it is a matter of efficiency, (to reduce duplicated efforts), the same reason your previous message suggested being more precise; so distro have a clear central resource where to find past knowledge, rather than repeating the same audits On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 04:19:00 +0200 Denis wrote: > > "is the license of 'bass' acceptable?" > It was not just bass but at least 2 or 3 other games if I recall well. there are only four scummvm games to deal with immediately - very likely, no others will ever be added to any distro - all four are in guix, trisquel, and pureos (and probably ututo) - parabola had only 'bass' and still has scummvm (with no dependents) - probably no other FSDG distros have any of these things we have a good handle on the entire situation - we only need to decide if the licenses are acceptable
