[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > i am much more in favor of first identifying which of those programs > > are amenable to the most and least feasible treatments, rather than > > to focus on any one without that foreknowledge; because frankly, i > > dont see any of them as important enough to prioritize blindly > This approach also lowers the risk: picking the easiest targets > increase the probability that things advance, and we can also learn > along the way what works and what doesn't. If it is feasible to compare them that way, I agree, provided that we make these judgments in a rough, approximate way. We would like to start with one of the easy targets, but we have no need to spend time to carefully determine which one is THE easiest. So when you have enough information to identify a few easy targets, please recommend one. Would a few of you like to form a committee to choose one? I think that would be useful. You could have discussions on another list specifically for this. Can you set yourselves a deadline of 3 weeks to find which are the easier targets, and report? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
