i think it is time to revisit this issue

TLDR: the FSDG explicitly forbids "third-party repositories that are not
committed to only including free software"

when we left off in august 2023, IIRC we had all agreed that most third-party
package managers were FSDG-unfit - i proposed to remove all of them from all
FSDG distros until each, in their own time, could be examined and liberated
satisfactorily - o/c no such proposal should have been needed - the FSDG is
uncharacteristically precise about this; but these TPPMs slipped into distros
under the radar somehow

there was allegedly a work-group within GNU working specifically on liberating
the rust cargo package manager; although it was a private work-group, and
AFAIK, no progress has been reported publicly - on that basis, RMS wanted to
allow distros to continue distributing these for some grace period, while
people make progress on the important ones; and this work-group was instructed
to defer the liberating of the rust package manager to GNU

can we get an update on GNU's rust/cargo liberation progress?

consequently on that basis, i proposed to send notice to all FSDG distros
regarding this grace period, to give them ample time to prepare for the purge,
and/or to entice them to help to rescue their user's favorites - unfortunately
at the time, the FSF was lacking its licensing officer who could give such
notice credibly

surely, a reasonable grace period has expired by now - this issue was first
raised in 2016 - the most notable change since then, is that we have a
licensing officer now with the authority to enforce the FSDG - to protect the
integrity and credibility of the FSDG, we must correct this discrepancy,
whether or not it causes grief or is perceived as authoritarian

Reply via email to