Rick wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:09:04 -0700, John Bailo wrote: > >> Ku Karlovsky wrote: >> >> >>> The Hurd developers concluded, as did many others before them, that >>> Mach's performance and stability was insufficient. OS/X's kernel is a >>> monolithic kernel based on a rewritten Mach microkernel with parts of >>> the FreeBSD kernel embedded in it. >> >> So shouldn't OSX be licensed under GPL then? > > BSD. And much if it is. >
I still don't understand. Mach is owned by GNU ( or licensed under GPL ). If OSX is based -- or includes -- Mach code, then doesn't that GPL OSX? -- Texeme Textcasting Technology http://www.texeme.com _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
