David Kastrup wrote: > A license is something that comes with every copy. Whether or not the > copies the FSF distributes come under GPL does not influence the > license of other copies.
According to the Mach license: http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/mach/public/FAQ/license.info " 2. If the LICENSEE develops any enhancements to the software which materially improves its operation and if those enhancements are redistributed to others, LICENSEE agrees to make such enhancements available to LICENSOR without charge and to allow LICENSOR to redistribute such modifications and derivative works thereof to others. LICENSOR agrees to withhold source redistribution of LICENSEE's machine dependent software enhancements for a period of eighteen months at the written request of the LICENSEE." So, why isn't OSX code made freely available via the Mach license? -- Texeme Textcasting Technology http://www.texeme.com _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
