On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:21 -0600, John Hasler wrote: > Rui writes: > > Since Digital Restrictions Management doesn't affect only generic > > computers but also the access to works (which can be revoked), I disagree > > and maintain my generic view that DRM is theft. > > DRM backed up by law is abusive, but DRM alone is a private matter.
The law only protect circunvention. But suppose circunvention wasn't technically feasible... Regardless of law, DRM is theft. If there sould be a law, it should forbid DRM. Rui
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
