Rui writes: > Since Digital Restrictions Management doesn't affect only generic > computers but also the access to works (which can be revoked), I disagree > and maintain my generic view that DRM is theft.
I wrote: > DRM backed up by law is abusive, but DRM alone is a private matter. Rui writes: > The law only protect circunvention. You mean the law _forbids_ circumvention. The law is wrong. > But suppose circunvention wasn't technically feasible... Don't buy it if you don't like it. > Regardless of law, DRM is theft. Is not publishing at all theft? > If there sould be a law, it should forbid DRM. There should be fewer laws of all sorts. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
