On 2006-03-24, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Although a vertical, maximum-price-fixing agreement is unlawful under 
> 1 of the Sherman Act, it does not cause a competitor antitrust injury 
> unless it results in predatory pricing." -- U.S. Supreme Court

You have yet to show that setting a price at zero is predatory
pricing. Just selling below cost is not by definition predatory.

Merijn

-- 
Remove +nospam to reply
_______________________________________________
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to