Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Merijn de Weerd wrote: > [...] >> Wallace got dismissed because he could not show injury. > > Judge Tinder silently ignored Wallace's argument regarding predatory > pricing which is central to antitrust injury in Wallace's case. The > Judge didn't explain why he did it. To me, it appears that he is less > versed in antitrust than Wallace.
To you a lot of things appear. Legal competence necessitates a certain correlation to what things appear to judges. And they apparently have not been raised in Terekhov land. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
