Merijn de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2006-05-16, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Merijn de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Right now the GPL makes a distinction for in-house code. Only >>> if you distribute binaries do you have to share the source. I >>> was just saying that that should change: also in-house code >>> should be shared, once it's out of testing. >> >> Why should that change? > > Web services are going to replace software distributed on media. > If anyone can use GPL software to offer a service to the public > without having to share modifications, that blows free software > right out of the water.
"To the public" is not "internal use". -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
