David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Why don't you simply check it yourself. There's tons of separate > >> > and independent bodies of code in the Linux kernel and they are > >> > even under different licenses. > >> > >> Does not make them independent. For that reason, no > >> GPL-incompatible parts are admitted into the kernel. > > > > GPL-(in)compatiblity is a fiction. > > Tell that to the courts.
dak, dak, dak. Post some of your GPL'd code. I'll write some code that links to it and put my code under "GPL-incompatible" license. You sue me and tell the opposite to the court. Deal? regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
