David Kastrup wrote: [...] > Uh what? You mean, if there are terms in Microsoft's EULA to be found > which don't jibe with the law, then XP is in the public domain? I > find that implausible.
http://interactionlaw.com/id12.html (Microsoft Risks Copyright Impotence) [...] > if it existed, he could point to it. http://www.danwal.com/ (Please be patient. Please be patient.) [...] > > You're arguing against a caricature of his case, and not his case > > itself. > > Yes, that's exactly what I say. But that caricature is of your own making. Wallace has 30 days to appeal. I hope he will. We'll see. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
