David Kastrup wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Tobin) writes: > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Red Hat recoups losses from GPL conspiracy (with other co-conspirators > >>in predatory priced IP that is meant to kill competition) by higher > >>prices of their subscription service contracts. > > > >>"A plaintiff must prove (1) that the prices complained of are below an > >>appropriate measure of its rival's costs > > > > Red Hat's competitors can, like Red Hat, obtain the GNU and Linux > > software at no cost, so it's hard to see in what way their prices are > > below their rivals' costs. > > It is also somewhat hard to see what meaning the term > "co-conspirators" is supposed to carry if anybody can join the > "conspiracy" without previous notice while the "conspiracy" is > entirely in the open.
Google "antitrust conspiracy". regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
