http://opensource.sys-con.com/read/224798.htm
The second decision came from a different judge in the Southern
District of Indiana and, like the first judge and the FSF
complaint, he found that Wallace didn't properly state a claim.
He said he accepted the allegations as true but that Wallace
didn't allege anticompetitive effects in an identifiable market
by arguing that it stopped him from marketing his own OS and
dismissed the case with prejudice figuring Wallace couldn't
remedy the deficiencies.
The judge wrote that "Antitrust laws are for 'the protection of
competition, not competitors.' In this case, the GPL benefits
consumers by allowing for the distribution of software at no
cost, other than the cost of the media on which the software is
distributed
*sigh* I guess judges just err and err, don't they Alex? You're the only
soldier boy saluting properly within thousands of bad performers in the
military parade, I suppose, to your parents.
Rui
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
