Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> > Moglen: We have made one clarification, as we see it, of what we >> > believe was always the rule. We reasserted that code dynamically linked >> > to GPL code--which the GPL code is intended to require, not merely >> > optionally incorporate--is part of the source code of the work under >> > the GPL and must be released. >> > >> > </quote> >> > >> > So much about "the GPL rejects any automatic aggregation of software >> > copyrights" the FSF been telling to the Judge in court of law. To >> > quote day5done, >> >> Linking is not aggregation. > > Static linking certainly is.
Only in Terekhov-Lala-land. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
