David Kastrup wrote: [...] > Uh, the GPL also has the backing of IBM.
Yeah. Apart from contributing to just few GPL'd projects for strategic reasons, it is no secret that IBM treats [L]GPL'd code like a kind of toxic waste. The general rule is "seek for alternative". The preferred license for IBM's own open source is the CPL. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
