Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> The GPL does not demand _anything_ as long as you are not using
>> _others'_ property licensed under the GPL. And then _their_ property
>> rights chip in, and they are perfectly allowed to give you license
>
> Except that the GPL blatantly misstates the scope of property rights
> under copyright. It pretends that both 17 USC 109 and 117 are simply
> nonexistent (true in the GNU Republic). Then comes the issue of price
> fixing at predatory ("no charge") level of pooled IP in derivative
> and collective works.
You are babbling. This sort of babbling constitutes so little in way
of a coherent argument that it has already been thrown out of court
(remember Wallace?) in spite of your gleeful appreciation of it.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
