David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote: > > [...] > >> It appears that I am _already_ pissing you off. Anyway: his > >> shareware contains GPLed parts then, and I don't see how the user > >> can modify, improve and distribute those parts while retaining a > >> working executable. > > > > Uh. And what does "retaining a working executable" have to do with > > users ability to modify, improve and distribute the GPL parts? Make > > your own executable employing the modified GPL parts. > > So you agree that the GPLed parts of the executable can't be modified, > improved and distributed? Fine, you get it.
Uh. Another GNUtian jumping to idiotic conclusions. How typical. Of course GPL'd parts of whatever can be modified improved and distributed. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
