Seg, 2006-08-14 às 11:15 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > It clearly misstates the copyright law (by ignoring 17 USC 109 and 117). > But what it means apart from misstatement, is that the GPL acceptance > is manifested by exercising exclusive rights granted under it.
There is only a "misstate" if your intention is to foil the copyright license by trying to bypass it alledging other dubious things. Judges won't fall for that kind of intent. Rui
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
