David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Piss off, retard dak. Go to doctor.
>
> It seems like I am already doing quite a good job at pissing you off
> without requiring external input, but thanks for the suggestion.
Man oh man, you're really krank. It doesn't matter how you label computer
program works ("application" vs "library" is utterly irrelevant) which work
together in combination. In MySQL v. Progress, the Gemini (transactional
storage engine) was a "library" (used by MySQL and statically linked to the
MySQL code), not "application".
To quote Judge Saris,
http://pacer.mad.uscourts.gov/dc/opinions/saris/pdf/progress%20software.pdf
-----
With respect to the General Public License (GPL), MySQL has not
demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or
irreparable harm. Affidavits submitted by the parties experts raise
a factual dispute concerning whether the Gemini program is a
derivative or an independent and separate work under GPL ¶ 2.
-----
So MySQL lost and didn't get an injunction.
regards,
alexander.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
