David Kastrup wrote: [...] > Yes, and he quite clearly stated that their product as a whole was > supposed to have a GPLed component, ergo be a combined work derived > from (among others) the GPLed piece.
His product as whole is NOT a derivative work, idiot. http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040207022922296 SCO: 30. The various identified versions of UNIX are sometimes referred to as UNIX flavors. All commercial UNIX flavors in use today are modifications of, and derivative works based on, the UNIX System V Technology (System V Technology). http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2004040118450269 IBM: 30. Denies the averments of paragrpah 30 as they relate to IBM and Sequent or to AIX and Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develps, manufactures and markets a product under the name "Dynix/ptx". regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
