Tim Smith wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Kastrup wrote: > > Competitors might try to sue for misleading advertising, but that's about > > it. There are no warranties, implied or otherwise, coming with GPLed > > software. The only person who has standing to sue for non-compliance is > > the copyright holder himself. As a recipient of misleadingly > > GPL-labelled, or incomplete software, you can't sue your source for > > compliance. You can only report this to the copyright holder, and he > > might consider action. > > Well, there will be no cause of action under copyright law, but there might > be under contract.
In dak's damaged brain there is no contract/promises made by (initial) GPL licensor that GPL licensees and subsequent GPL (sub)licensors can rely on to fulfill their GPL obligations. He's a clinical case. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
