Stefaan A Eeckels wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:52:55 +0200 > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sez who? Copying (and distribution) under 17 USC 117 (together with > > 109), for example, doesn't require a license, stupid. > > Has your teacher failed to tell you that calling people names lends no > credence to your arguments? As a matter of fact,
As a matter of fact, all I did was a statement of facts. It's a fact that copying (and distribution) under 17 USC 117 (together with 109), for example, doesn't require a license. It's a fact that GNUtian ams is stupid to boot. Otherwise he would grok the first fact long ago. I've been telling it all along. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
