> Just because it is not in a dictionary does not mean that the word > does not have a proper definition.
I did not say "dictionary". Just any old reference will serve. If the word has a proper definition, you should be able to give a _single_ reference from anywhere else but your own imagination. I have given you one such reference. Instead, you continue to behave in a silly manner, could you please stop that? > There are several words which are not in the dictionary which are > commonly used, and as it happens computer jargon like terms like > `freeware' are not defined in dictionaries, Oh, but there are jargon files, and a web search will easily dig up hundreds of definitions. Not everything is on the web. > they are defined by the community, and as it happens the > definition of freeware has always been `no charge non-free > software'. Then you should be able to find a single other person of "the community" that backs your definition. You alone don't constitute a community. Neither do you, it is quite sad to see such a hostile and rude behaviour from a fellow peer. You have on a continued basis started mud slinging capmaigns towards me and others of this community. Could you please stop doing so? It is not useful, nor is it a very useful way for you to spend your time. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
