"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Just because it is not in a dictionary does not mean that the word > > does not have a proper definition. > > I did not say "dictionary". Just any old reference will serve. If > the word has a proper definition, you should be able to give a > _single_ reference from anywhere else but your own imagination. > > I have given you one such reference.
"This is how it is" is not a reference. > > they are defined by the community, and as it happens the > > definition of freeware has always been `no charge non-free > > software'. > > Then you should be able to find a single other person of "the > community" that backs your definition. You alone don't > constitute a community. > > Neither do you, it is quite sad to see such a hostile and rude > behaviour from a fellow peer. You have on a continued basis started > mud slinging capmaigns towards me and others of this community. > Could you please stop doing so? It is not useful, nor is it a very > useful way for you to spend your time. If you are babbling nonsense, I won't weaken the stance of what you consider "this community" by joining in your nonsense. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
