"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately, Alfred's enthusiasm for free software often gets
> the better of him and makes him claim theories that are not
> supported by even the FSF. So when in doubt, rather consult the
> relevant FAQs, license texts and the responsible FSF personnel
> for getting the FSF's view.
>
> Simply false. The response I gave is what the FSF would tell you
> and anyone else. If you feel that it is wrong, please quote line
> and verse since yet again you resort to personal attacks, lies and
> FUD.
In the message you replied to, I already wrote:
I recommend reading <URL:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html>
and judging so for yourself. It states, for example:
<URL:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLIncompatibleAlone>
which makes clear the mechanism by which a combined executable to
be covered as a whole by the GPL is affected by non-GPLed
libraries. It is certainly not by the non-GPLed libraries
suddenly becoming derivatives of any other code.
It is disingenuous to cut away that passage and then protest that I
did not provide anything like it.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
