David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Stefaan A Eeckels wrote: > >> > [...] > >> >> Once you start transforming it through compilers and linkers the > >> >> picture might change, depending on how much of the library is included > >> >> in the transformed source code. If, for example, you execute 'cc -E', > >> >> the resulting source code will contain the whole of "stdio.h", and as > >> >> such it's now most definitely something that is affected by the stdio.h > >> >> copyright (I leave it to Alexander to define if it's a derivative work, > >> >> a compilation, or anything he wishes). > >> > > >> > Mechanical transformation never create derivative works. > >> > >> Sure, but we are not talking about "mechanical transformation", but > >> mechanical _combination_. "cc -E" _includes_ stdio.h and other stuff. > > > > Whatever, retard. > > Actually, it also replaces macros.
And? In other news RMS called to boycott Caterpillar, Exxon-Mobil, Coca Cola Company, Chinese products, and Harry Potter Books. > Looks like you have run out of arguments again. Uh moron dak. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
