On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:05:58 +0200 Merijn de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-10-16, Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This example program would dynamically link to both Qt and my > > sdk's library. > > > > This would make this non-free SDK library a derivate of Qt and the > > example program. > > I disagree. The example program is a derivative of both the > SDK library and the Qt library. The example in source format is an original work. Only when turned into an executable can it become a "derivative" of the library, and IMHO only then when it contains substantial parts of that library. The OP is proposing to add source code examples to his library. Assuming he did not base his source on existing source code examples of Qt, these examples are his original work, and not affected by the Qt, X, OpenGL, or whatever other license. -- Stefaan A Eeckels -- A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. -- Robert A. Heinlein _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
