On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:10:45 +0200 Stefaan A Eeckels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If the distributor can prove that one typical use case for a > > customer would be to let the code rot away without ever compiling or > > linking it (indeed a typical use case for example code), then the > > product does not implicitly include the library for its completion. > > has _nothing_ to do with "completeness" or "usefulness". This should have read: Copyright has _nothing_ to do with "completeness" or "usefulness". -- Stefaan A Eeckels -- Sometimes I wonder whether the world is run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it. --Mark Twain _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
