On 2006-11-06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Merijn de Weerd wrote: >> On 2006-11-06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > We still believe that we will be the dominant player in the Linux >> > market, because by that time there won't be any other Linux players. >> > ------ >> > >> > Hm... is this an invitation for Wallace to file another action under >> > Sherman Act 2 monopolization (in addition to his current section 1 > > ------ > Section 2. Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty
Like I said, stupid even for you. Do you know the difference between 'dominant' and 'monopolizing'? > Sure, if you don't break the law in the process (trying to obtain or > maintain a dominant position in a market). The essence of Wallace's > complaint is that the GPL does break the law being an illegal predatory > IP price fixing restraint (let's put aside MS workaround to monetize > MS patents while not contributing anything to the GPL pool and > distributing only coupons for the Novell's distro to which they've > attached a patent pledge for Novell's paying customers). Got it now? Of course not. Here, have a hankie, you're drooling. Merijn -- Remove +nospam to reply _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
