Hey de Weerd, I'm still waiting for you to illuminate me... http://www.linuxformat.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=326 (Interview: Novell's Greg Mancusi-Ungaro Thursday, May 11, 2006)
------ LXF: On the Novell company blogs recently, there's been a lot of discussion about whether a Linux company can be 'the next Microsoft'... Greg Mancusi-Ungaro: Well, Red Hat in one of their initial prospectuses said 'our goal is to be the Microsoft of Linux'. Actually, that made a lot of people wince! I don't think that should be the goal. I think what you want to be is, in effect, like Switzerland - you want to be the people of unquestionable integrity. ------ <chuckles> (slowly getting tired of all that GNU fun.) Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > Merijn de Weerd wrote: > > > > On 2006-11-06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Merijn de Weerd wrote: > > >> On 2006-11-06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > We still believe that we will be the dominant player in the Linux > > >> > market, because by that time there won't be any other Linux players. > > >> > ------ > > >> > > > >> > Hm... is this an invitation for Wallace to file another action under > > >> > Sherman Act 2 monopolization (in addition to his current section 1 > > > > > > ------ > > > Section 2. Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty > > > > Like I said, stupid even for you. Do you know the difference > > between 'dominant' and 'monopolizing'? > > Feel free to illuminate me (the context being "there won't be any other > Linux players"). regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
