rjack writes: > IBM argues throughout its MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION that the GPL license > is a contract.
It does not. It argues that the terms of the GPL are to be interpreted according to the rules of contract interpretation. > Does this mean that the esteemed Eben Moglen, RMS and his faithful > disciples have simply been blathering reams of FUD when claiming that the > "The GPL is a License, Not a Contract"? Where did you say you got your law degree? -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
