Qui, 2006-11-23 às 10:28 -0600, John Hasler escreveu:
> rjack writes:
> > IBM argues throughout its MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION that the GPL license
> > is a contract.
> 
> It does not.  It argues that the terms of the GPL are to be interpreted
> according to the rules of contract interpretation.
> 
> > Does this mean that the esteemed Eben Moglen, RMS and his faithful
> > disciples have simply been blathering reams of FUD when claiming that the
> > "The GPL is a License, Not a Contract"?
> 
> Where did you say you got your law degree?

I suspect our dear Alex might be impersonating two people. The style is
just too similar to be ignored.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente

_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to