On Aug 25, 8:06 pm, mike3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 25, 2:54 am, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > mike3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I was discussing here if the FSF or similar try to go after anyone > > > who uses a "proprietary" distribution model to further their own > > > agendas. > > > Since you have posted wishy-washy disingenuous scenarios/questions > > over months here without seemingly ever taking answers into account in > > your further postings, it would appear that you are either utterly > > unable to do any research or reading of your own and/or don't memorize > > any answers. > > There's so many of them, but I can't seem to figure this out. Does > this mean the answer is no (since you've said GPL only applies > to GPL software and anything not convered by GPL or affiliated > with it or FSF is way out of FSF's jurisdiction)? > > > So it would seem sort of pointless to "discuss" with you: nothing will > > stick, anyway. > > > What's your agenda? What are you hoping to achieve with your > > questions and discussions here? Do you feel you have made any > > progress in the last months? If yes, what would it be? If not, what > > could you do to improve your track record? > > My agenda is to understand this thing. >
Also, an addendum: I've read some of the stuff like the GNU manifesto, GPL FAQ, etc. but it doesn't quite answer _all_ the questions. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
