On Aug 25, 9:42 pm, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mike3 writes: > > That's just the word I used. I meant something like, the FSF has no legal > > influence or power beyond what I called it's "jurisdiction". > > The point is that the mere fact that a work is licensed under the terms of > the GPL does not give the FSF any "jurisdiction" or "power" or "influence" > over it whatsoever. If they own no copyright in it it is none of their > business.
Well the FSF could go and campaign against the use of one's software, couldn't they, just as they campaign against Microsoft's software? That's what I meant by "power", "influence", etc. > -- > John Hasler > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dancing Horse Hill > Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
