On May 26, 7:40 pm, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Hasler wrote: > > [...] > > > The terms of the MIT license are a subset of the > > terms of the GPL so by complying with the latter you are complying with the > > former. > > Okay, once again for mentally challenged: Complying with the latter > under GNUtian viral "work based on" theory requires "relicensing" > (seehttp://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3/barcelona-rms-transcript.en.html)
Forget what Stallman might _say_ - he is no a lawyer. Try reading the MIT and GPL licenses and thinking it through for yourself. Cheers, Dave _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
