In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is true of Stallman's written works, but I would be very wary of > > putting any trust in something from a transcription of an audio > > recording of a spoken comment made in a Q&A session after a speech. > > He's had enough real interaction with lawyers on these issues that > surely he's formed reasonable instincts regarding them. > > Terekhov, on the other hand, is simply a blithering idiot.
So how come Federal courts seem to mostly agree with Tereknov's positions? How come when RMS decides to wax forth legalistically, there never seem to be either cases or statutes that back his position? -- --Tim Smith _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
