Richard Tobin wrote:
1. Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. 2. Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. 3. Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. 4. Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice.
Yes. In each case, the defendant gave in and did what was required by the GPL.
In each case, the plaintiffs dismissed before the Court could even read the text of the GPL... it was that or pay the defendants' attorney fees and court costs. In the Verizon case, Verizon kicked their butt out of court and forced them to give up the right to file their silly GPL claims against Verizon ever again. Sincerely, Rjack :) --- "A voluntary dismissal with prejudice operates as a final adjudication on the merits and has a res judicata effect. Harrison v. Edison Bros. Apparel Stores, Inc., 924 F.2d 530, 534 (4th Cir. 1991) (concluding that a voluntary dismissal with prejudice 'is a complete adjudication on the merits of the dismissed claim.')"; The Travelers Insurance Company v. AlliedSignal TBS Holdings, 2001 FED App. 0357P (6th Cir.) --- _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
