David Kastrup wrote:
rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
.........
That they can't bring the identical case a second time. Why would they,
when they got an agreement to compliance?
Uhhhhhhhhh.
Question: For what use is an unenforceable agreement?
Answer: The same use as an unenforceable GPL license. Toilet paper.
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
--- "Although the United States Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. ยงยง 101- 1332,
grants exclusive jurisdiction for infringement claims to the federal
courts, those courts construe copyrights as contracts and turn to the
relevant state law to interpret them."; Automation by Design, Inc. v.
Raybestos Products Co., 463 F.3d 749, (United States Court of Appeals
for the Seventh Circuit 2006) ---
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
