rjack wrote:
What is manifestly clear from case law is that once a copyright owner repeatedly brings meritless claims that are not within the jurisdiction
> of the court, the court will assume that the purported copyright owner > is filing frivolous, harassing actions subject to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 11 > sanctions.
It's a long hard slog before a court will assume that, though: <http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/06/04/florida-bar-wants-jack-thompson-disbarred-10-years-thompson-storms-out-hearing> I would guess that a prerequisite would be for a court to actually decide that the claims were frivolous, which is difficult when the cases are settled before they get to trial. I will anxiously await a courageous code grabber who is willing to go all the way, and then we'll see. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
