David Kastrup wrote:
As far as I remember, Daniel Wallace actually tried some "all the way" approach in the U.S., and it was thrown out in the end because his theories did not even amount to a recognizable complaint.
He doesn't count. First of all, he did it pro se, and you can't expect to succeed in such a complicated area without being or having a lawyer. Second of all, he was suing on antitrust terms, while naturally being unable to show any damages to the public. He appeared to be under the impression that antitrust law means to protect competitors, not the public. He was wrong. Because of the licensing terms of free software, it is impossible for its price to be raised after competitors are driven out of business. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
