Tim Smith writes: > The other way, which is the one I believe courts usually go with, is for > the court to ask what would have happened if D had obeyed the actual > license that D had.
He would not have received whatever benefits he received as a consequence of not obeying the license. Those would go to the copyright owner, less any direct expenses the infringer could prove, plus any damages the copyright owner could prove. This is all assuming, of course, that the copyright owner elects not to demand statutory damages. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
