In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Under that analysis, P expected to make $0 off of D's use of the > > software, so I don't think it is likely the court would award much > > more than that. > > Uh, under that analysis, D is still expected to comply with the license > conditions. So the court would tell D to comply. But it would be a > strange court that told P he should expect to hold up his part of the > deal (the $0 part) while D can be excused from compliance with his part. > > I mean, get real.
Who said D would be excused from compliance? I sure didn't. If P prevails, D will be ordered to stop infringing. -- --Tim Smith _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
