Alexander Terekhov wrote:
And what are those non-technical "violations" successfully
> litigated in court by SFLC?
The purpose of the enforcement activities is so that when a binary GPL-licensed program is distributed, the vendor distributes the sources as well. The purpose of the SFLC actions isn't to successfully litigate, it's to have the GPL be followed. Do you know of an instance where the SFLC has dropped a case and the GPLed source code remained unavailable? In the Actiontec case, the manufacturer is making the GPLed sources available. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
