David Kastrup wrote: [...] > default copyright provisions. Or b) GPL applies to me. Then the case > is about checking off whether the conditions are met. Again, this is > not about the validity of the GPL as such but about specific terms of > it. > > And the cases we had up to now were so clearly lost on option b) that
Why don't you quote ratio decidendi of some case where defendant lost on option b? Stop hallucinating, GNUtian dak. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
