Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Why don't you quote ratio decidendi of some case where defendant
> lost on option b?
Do you know of instances where after the SFLC dismissed a case, the source code of the GPLed software in question was not made available? If the software was always made available, then the defendants either believe the GPL is valid or believe that a court would believe that the GPL is valid or believe that it's no large burden to make the source available regardless. In any of these alternatives, the GPL wins. Motivation for obeying the license doesn't matter. Obeying the license does. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
