John Hasler wrote: > > Tim Smith wrote: > > The copies were pretty clearly made lawfully under GPL. I am clearly the > > owner of the copies. So, why can't I take advantage of first sale and > > sell them, without the need of copyright permission? > > Because you agreed not to sell them without source when you accepted the > GPL which you did when you made the copies.
Ahhh. But don't you know that the GPL is not a contract (agreement) in the GNU Republic, uncle Hasler? :-) Anyway, how does a breach of that promise/obligation could possibly violate copyright law given 17 USC 109? regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
