"amicus_curious" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I find the many web sites that publish descriptive "how-to" projects as >sample code to be much more useful than GPL stuff. These authors seem only >interested in educating those who read their articles and rarely demand any >sort of quid pro quo. Microsoft itself publishes gigabytes of tutorials and >samples for this purpose.
Since you were defending the MIT license and criticizing the GPL license, let me ask you this: These "how-to" web sites, including Microsoft's alleged gigabytes of tutorials -- do they use the MIT license, thus allowing you to freely republish their content freely? If not, then I fail to see your point. -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
