Rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Rjack is certainly not dumb enough to rise to your challenge and >attempt to "find" a plaintiff, thereby attempting to prove a >negative. If you wish to claim that flying pigs (your imaginary >plaintiffs) exist then produce your flying pigs for examination.
Excellent analogy. Plaintiffs that defeat the GPL are like flying pigs -- nonexistent. -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
