Rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which is complete, 100% bullshit. You don't control "commercial > compilers" so how do know?
So... You're now claiming that you can re-distribute a commercial compiler? Do you KNOW what software piracy is? >> With SOME commercial compilers you can't even sell your own code without >> permission from the compiler's owner. And then they expect you to pay for >> the privilage. > With SOME compilers you can sell your own code without permission > from the compiler's owner. And then they don't expect you to pay for > the privilege. So? Reversing what I said doesn't make it any less true. >> With the GPL based compiler, you can do what the hell you like with your own >> code with no restrictions. Only if you include other people's GPL code are >> you bound by the GPL yourself. >> >> By eck, the quality of trolls these days is shocking. > > By eck? Is that shorthand script-kiddie? No, look it up. -- | [EMAIL PROTECTED],uk | "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" | | Andrew Halliwell BSc | | | in | "I think so brain, but this time, you control | | Computer Science | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." | _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
